Survivors of the 2009 Fort Hood mass shooting have expressed a range of emotions following the Pentagon’s decision to livestream the execution of Nidal Malik Hasan. The former Army officer is scheduled to be executed by firing squad on December 3 at Fort Hood, Texas. This planned livestream marks an unprecedented move in U.S. military executions.
Information was available with The Chenab Times indicating that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recommended, and President Donald Trump approved, the execution by firing squad. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell confirmed the President’s approval. The execution is scheduled to take place at the same military base where Hasan carried out his attack on November 5, 2009, resulting in the deaths of 13 people and injuries to 32 others. The execution time is set for 1 p.m. Central Time, mirroring the time of the original attack.
The decision to livestream Hasan’s execution has drawn widespread condemnation from various quarters, including lawmakers, human rights organizations, and international bodies. Critics have likened the plan to practices in authoritarian regimes and have raised concerns about the ethical implications and potential for it to be a form of cruel and unusual punishment. The United Nations’ office of the high commissioner for human rights warned that broadcasting the execution could breach the absolute prohibition of torture and amount to a public execution.
Vice President JD Vance has expressed skepticism about the livestream plan, stating he was unsure if it would proceed and that he would not watch it if it did. Some Republican lawmakers have also voiced opposition, while a top U.S. Catholic bishop has called the plan “barbaric.” Concerns have also been raised about the potential for a livestreamed execution to be viewed by minors, despite Army policy limiting witnesses to those aged 18 and older.
Alonzo Lunsford, a survivor who was shot seven times during the 2009 attack, articulated a desire to witness Hasan’s execution in person to confront him directly. However, Lunsford opposes the livestream, referring to it as a potential “pay-per-view event” and expressing concern for children’s exposure to such graphic content. He emphasized that the country is better than normalizing such violence.
The execution method, firing squad, is the first to be used by the U.S. military since 1961, when John Bennett was executed by hanging. The last execution by firing squad occurred during World War II. Hasan, who was 56 at the time of the reporting and is described as being paralyzed from the chest down, has been on death row at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.
Legal experts have noted that Hasan could potentially delay his execution by filing a habeas corpus petition in civilian court, a process that has historically led to significant delays in military death penalty cases. The Pentagon has stated that more details regarding the livestream would be provided, though the specific technical arrangements remain unclear.
The decision by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to recommend the livestream was described as a “no-brainer” by him, emphasizing the need for “serious consequences” for such crimes. President Trump’s past statements have shown support for capital punishment, including public executions as a deterrent, though he has reportedly not yet made a final determination on the livestream aspect.
Some survivors and victim advocates have also raised concerns that classifying the 2009 attack as “workplace violence” rather than domestic terrorism has impacted benefits for civilian employees who were present during the shooting. They are advocating for a reclassification and for a benefits package for civilian employees comparable to that for service members.
The planned execution and its potential livestream have ignited a debate about capital punishment, military justice, and the ethics of broadcasting executions. While the Pentagon’s stance emphasizes accountability and consequences, critics argue for a more humane and less sensational approach, aligning with international human rights standards.
❤️ Support Independent Journalism
Your contribution keeps our reporting free, fearless, and accessible to everyone.
Or make a one-time donation
Secure via Razorpay • 12 monthly payments • Cancel anytime before next cycle
(We don't allow anyone to copy content. For Copyright or Use of Content related questions, visit here.)
Global Affairs Desk at The Chenab Times covers international developments, global diplomacy, and foreign policy issues through fact-based reporting, explainers, and analytical pieces. The desk focuses on major geopolitical events, diplomatic engagements, and international trends, with an emphasis on verified information, multiple perspectives, and contextual understanding of global affairs.
