NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday concluded its supervision of the alleged theft of donations for the Ayodhya Ram temple, having been informed that a charge sheet has been filed against eight individuals implicated in the case. The apex court, however, permitted the petitioners to assist the trial court in the proceedings, acknowledging the significant public interest involved.
SC Disposes of Probe Monitoring
A Bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant noted the submission of the charge sheet by the Special Investigation Team (SIT), a copy of which was presented to the court. The Bench stated that the state could proceed with the trial in accordance with the law. It also granted the SIT liberty to continue its investigation into the matter.
Information was available with The Chenab Times that while disposing of the petitions that had sought an independent probe, possibly by the CBI, into the alleged irregularities, the Bench, which included Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana, remarked, “Since there is an element of public interest involved, liberty is granted to the petitioner to assist the court of judicial magistrate as the law enables the victims of crime to also assist the court.”
Further Legal Recourse Allowed
The Supreme Court also declined to entertain a separate plea that questioned whether the land on which the Ram temple stands was part of the adjudication in the main Ayodhya dispute case. The Bench advised the petitioners in this regard to approach a civil court for appropriate relief, indicating that this matter fell outside the scope of the current investigation being monitored.
Investigation Details Emerge
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Uttar Pradesh government, informed the court that the investigation had reached its conclusion, with a charge sheet now filed against the eight accused. He detailed that the thefts reportedly occurred during the counting process of donations, with the culprits being individuals involved in the counting. Mr. Mehta further stated that the SIT traced the stolen funds back to the accused individuals’ bank accounts and subsequent property purchases, including land. An audit has also been conducted, accounting for all artifacts and donations. He assured the court that measures have been put in place to prevent any recurrence of such incidents.
Background of the Case
The Supreme Court’s intervention and monitoring stemmed from allegations of embezzlement of donations collected for the construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya. The SIT, appointed by the apex court, had been tasked with investigating these claims. Previously, on September 21, the SIT had indicated its intention to file its first charge sheet by or before September 25, signifying the progress of the investigation under the court’s watchful eye.
The closing of the monitoring by the Supreme Court marks a significant development in the Ayodhya Ram temple donation case. The filing of the charge sheet and the court’s decision to allow petitioners to assist the trial court suggest a move towards judicial resolution of the allegations. The emphasis on public interest by the apex court underscores the sensitivity surrounding the temple project and its financial dealings. The Uttar Pradesh government, through its counsel, has affirmed that the investigation is complete and that measures are being implemented to ensure accountability and prevent future misappropriations.
The court’s directive for petitioners to approach a civil court for the separate issue concerning the land adjudication signifies a clear delineation of judicial processes, separating the investigation of alleged financial misconduct from the broader legal historical context of the Ayodhya dispute. The ongoing trial is expected to bring clarity to the allegations and hold those found responsible accountable under the law.
❤️ Support Independent Journalism
Your contribution keeps our reporting free, fearless, and accessible to everyone.
Or make a one-time donation
Secure via Razorpay • 12 monthly payments • Cancel anytime before next cycle
(We don't allow anyone to copy content. For Copyright or Use of Content related questions, visit here.)
The Chenab Times News Desk
