Nadal, Djokovic and how character shaped the plot of the Australian Open

For these a fan of blissful endings, the world {of professional} sports activities is notoriously strewn with heartbreak. Competitors isn’t the place to hunt poetic justice. Villains usually prosper within the warmth of battle, and heroes can come up quick even with a complete stadium on their facet.

At a time when athletes appear to relish their antihero position, exploiting their superstar for particular favor, sounding off on controversial topics they know little about and appearing as if they’re larger than the game that made them well-known within the first place, the Australian Open confirmed simply how satisfying it may be when position fashions like Rafael Nadal and Ashleigh Barty triumph.

This was not the anticipated script for a match that made worldwide headlines earlier than the primary ball was even struck. Novak Djokovic discovered himself embroiled in a bureaucratic and public relations nightmare when his visa was canceled upon his arrival in Australia, then reinstated, then canceled once more by the nation’s immigration {minister}. Djokovic, who’s unvaccinated for COVID-19, had obtained a medical exemption to enter Australia to play the match. However the exception that was granted provoked a political firestorm after Djokovic posted about his journey plans on Instagram. An outraged public that had endured months of lockdown couldn’t perceive why strict guidelines had been being all of a sudden bent for a preening athlete.

Ashleigh Barty of Australia celebrates match level in her Girls’s Singles Last match towards Danielle Collins of United States throughout day 13 of the 2022 Australian Open.

(Clive Brunskill / Getty Pictures)

Australia’s Ashleigh Barty poses with the 2022 Australian Open winner’s trophy in Melbourne.

(Martin Preserve / AFP by way of Getty Pictures)

Djokovic isn’t any Aaron Rodgers. He’s not engaged in partisan mudslinging and has principally stored his opposition to COVID-19 vaccines to himself. However he has let his pseudo-scientific views be identified and, worse, he has acted irresponsibly throughout the pandemic, holding a charity match in 2020 that turned a super-spreader occasion, breaking quarantine protocol when he was apparently COVID-positive in December and offering inaccurate details about his journey historical past on his Australian visa utility.

Information experiences have questioned the timing of Djokovic’s COVID-19 check, the supply of his medical exemption. How a lot harm has been finished to his repute stays to be seen, however I’m certain I’m not the one one questioning to what lengths would possibly he have gone to win one other Australian Open and assume the mantle of Best of All Time?

That query was rendered moot on Sunday, as Rafael Nadal, who started his profession in Roger Federer’s shadow and has watched Djokovic develop into the undisputed No. 1 participant on the planet, did the inconceivable. Down two units to like towards the Russian ball machine Daniil Medvedev within the remaining, the Spaniard dug himself a hardcourt trench and refused to surrender additional floor, successful the following three units and taking the title, his second Australian Open crown.

The victory was Nadal’s twenty first Grand Slam singles title, breaking the report he shared with Federer and Djokovic, each of whom have their very own declare to being the GOAT. That debate hasn’t been quashed by Nadal taking this momentary benefit. There are three extra Grand Slams this yr, and although a hobbled 40-year-old Federer’s greatest days are probably behind him, Djokovic was in uncommon type final yr, almost successful all 4 Slams, one thing that hasn’t been finished on the lads’s facet since Rod Laver pulled it off in 1969.

It was Medvedev who beat Djokovic within the U.S. Open males’s remaining final yr, eagerly enjoying the spoiler, a job that comes naturally to this 6-foot-6 human backboard with a sly wit. Intelligent on and off the courtroom, Medvedev enjoys psyching out his opponents not solely together with his mixture of impenetrable protection and sneaky offense however together with his needling feedback.

In a fourth-round match towards up-and-coming Maxime Cressy, a server and volley specialist who gained the NCAA doubles title when enjoying for the UCLA Bruins, Medvedev vented his frustration at his opponent’s “boring” fashion of play and attributed a few of Cressy’s success to pure “luck.” Towards Stefanos Tsitsipas within the semifinals, Medvedev lambasted the chair umpire for giving him a warning whereas not doing something concerning the unlawful teaching Tsitsipas was apparently receiving from his father, a persistent downside. Medvedev’s screaming match culminated within the epithet “small cat,” presumably to keep away from the advantageous that may have been levied had he not discovered an oblique manner of phrasing his insult.

Medvedev has develop into tennis’ model of the web troll. He provides sportswriters good materials, however you wouldn’t need your child to repeat his smirk. It was no shock that the group at Rod Laver Area could be overwhelmingly on Nadal’s facet, but Medvedev appeared thrown by the antipathy.

He repeatedly advised the chair umpire to inform the group to not erupt in jubilation when he missed a primary serve. He mocked the group’s applause at his unforced errors. (Professional tip: Making dismissive hand gestures to a packed stadium isn’t one of the best ways to win associates and affect folks.) He was inside touching distance of the trophy, however the villainous temperament he has cultivated as a weapon labored towards him: He was preventing not simply an indefatigable and beloved Nadal but in addition a disaffected nation.

Spain’s Rafael Nadal reacts after successful towards Russia’s Daniil Medvedev throughout their males’s singles remaining match on day 14 of the Australian Open tennis match in Melbourne.

(Brandon Malone / AFP by way of Getty Pictures)

Rafael Nadal celebrates successful a degree throughout the Australia open.

(Hamish Blair / Related Press)

Australia takes its sporting values significantly, which is why Barty’s hard-fought win over a powerful American Danielle Collins on Saturday was greeted with {national} jubilation. The humblest of champions who’s fast to credit score her opponent in victory or defeat, Barty turned the primary Australian girls’s single titleholder since Chris O’Neil in 1978. The trophy ceremony was made all of the sweeter by the presence of Evonne Goolagong, a fellow Australian of Indigenous background who has impressed Barty to embrace her roots as she takes her place in her nation’s storied tennis custom.

Barty has lengthy left the highlight to different gamers. She hasn’t been a magnet for endorsement offers. When she took a break from the sport for comparable causes to Naomi Osaka, she didn’t develop into the topic of countless profiles, op-eds and social media dissection. Style magazines haven’t taken a lot discover.

With a gracious sense of truthful play that’s as a lot of a throwback as her all-court recreation, Barty proves that it’s attainable to be good and nonetheless be nice. Stardom is inevitable once you win the French Open, Wimbledon and now the Australian Open. However irrespective of what number of Grand Slams she racks up, her legacy will likely be inseparable from her exemplary sportsmanship.

In contrast to Djokovic, who has been on a fanatical mission to beat tennis historical past, Nadal has made clear that his happiness isn’t decided by what number of Grand Slams he has. “You possibly can’t be annoyed on a regular basis as a result of the neighbor has a much bigger home than you. … That’s not the best way that I see the life,” he has stated in quite a lot of methods in his at all times charming English.

Ever the thinker in press conferences, Nadal, who wasn’t certain if he’d be returning to the tour after struggling a career-threatening foot harm final season, isn’t afraid to inform you what he thinks. When requested about Djokovic’s travails with the immigration authorities, he expressed sympathy for his rival’s plight however famous, “He knew the circumstances since numerous months in the past, so he makes his personal determination.” Relating to vaccines, Nadal was extra direct: “I consider in what the individuals who learn about medication say, and if the folks say that we have to get vaccinated, we have to get the vaccine.”

In a world through which politics and superstar have develop into so debased, the place successful usually looks like the one factor that issues, it’s a stirring sight when athletes flip the ethical script. When requested after his win for the keys to his success, Nadal contemplated a second earlier than replying, “Love for the sport, ardour, optimistic angle, and dealing spirit. … And the appropriate folks subsequent to me, serving to each single day.”

Character, for all the appropriate causes, was future at this yr’s Australian Open.

❤️ Support Independent Journalism

Your contribution keeps our reporting free, fearless, and accessible to everyone.

Secure via Razorpay • 12 monthly payments • Cancel anytime before next cycle