The European Commission delivered a significant blow to Elon Musk’s social media platform X on Friday, December 5, 2025, by imposing a €120 million ($140 million) fine—the first penalty ever issued under the bloc’s Digital Services Act (DSA). This ruling stems from a two-year investigation into X’s compliance with transparency obligations, highlighting systemic failures in user verification, advertising disclosure, and data access for researchers. The decision underscores the EU’s determination to enforce its sweeping digital regulations amid growing transatlantic tensions over tech governance.
According to details received by The Chenab Times, the fine is broken down as follows: €45 million for the “deceptive” design of X’s blue checkmark verification system, €35 million for inadequate transparency in its advertising repository, and €40 million for blocking researchers’ access to public data. The Commission emphasized that these breaches undermine user trust and hinder efforts to combat online harms, such as scams and disinformation. Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty and Democracy Henna Virkkunen, in a detailed press statement, described the violations as “a clear evasion of accountability,” stating, “With the DSA’s first non-compliance decision, we are holding X responsible for undermining users’ rights and evading accountability. Transparency is not optional—it’s the cornerstone of a safe digital single market.” Virkkunen further elaborated that the DSA does not seek to censor content but to empower users and researchers with verifiable information, warning that “platforms must design systems that foster trust, not deception.”
The investigation, initiated in December 2023, scrutinized X’s practices across multiple fronts. At the heart of the blue checkmark violation is the platform’s shift under Musk’s ownership from a merit-based verification process—previously reserved for journalists, celebrities, and public figures after identity checks—to a pay-for-privilege model launched in 2022. The Commission ruled this change constitutes a “dark pattern” under Article 25 of the DSA, which prohibits manipulative interface designs that mislead users. “X’s use of the ‘blue checkmark’ for ‘verified accounts’ deceives users,” the Commission’s statement explicitly noted. “This violates the DSA obligation for online platforms to prohibit deceptive design practices on their services. While the DSA does not mandate user verification, it clearly prohibits online platforms from falsely claiming that users have been verified, when no such verification took place.” This practice, regulators argued, makes it “difficult for users to judge the authenticity of accounts and content they engage with,” potentially amplifying misinformation from impersonators or paid influencers posing as credible sources. The probe highlighted how the paid badge, now available for as little as €8 per month, has eroded the symbol’s reliability, contributing to a surge in verified-like accounts spreading unvetted content.
Equally concerning to the EU was X’s advertising repository, mandated under Article 26 of the DSA to be a searchable, publicly accessible database detailing ad sponsors, targeting criteria, and delivery metrics. The Commission found X’s implementation lacking in accessibility, with “excessive delays in processing requests” and design barriers that “undermine the repository’s purpose.” This opacity, according to the statement, blurs the line between organic content and paid promotions, facilitating financial scams and undetected influence campaigns. “Platforms in the EU are required to provide a database of all the digital advertisements they have carried, with details such as who paid for them and the intended audience, to help researchers detect scams, fake ads, and coordinated influence campaigns,” the Commission explained. Virkkunen reinforced this in her remarks, noting that “blurring the line between advertising and content could lead to financial scams for users,” and stressed that such transparency is essential for civil society and watchdogs to monitor systemic risks. The fine reflects the duration and severity of these lapses, which persisted despite preliminary warnings shared with X in July 2024.
The third pillar of the ruling addresses X’s failure to grant researchers access to public data under Article 40 of the DSA, which requires very large online platforms (VLOPs) like X—designated due to its 100 million-plus EU users—to share anonymized datasets on views, likes, and content dissemination. The Commission criticized X for imposing undue restrictions, stating that this “hinders independent research into platform risks, including the spread of illegal content and systemic threats to civic discourse.” Virkkunen elaborated: “The DSA gives researchers the way to uncover potential threats… X’s blocking of this access not only evades scrutiny but deprives society of tools to safeguard democracy.” This violation is particularly poignant given ongoing DSA probes into X’s content moderation and algorithmic biases, which could lead to escalated penalties if unresolved.
In announcing the fine, the Commission outlined a structured remediation timeline: X has 60 working days to address the blue checkmark issues and 90 days to submit comprehensive action plans for the advertising and data access breaches. Non-compliance could trigger periodic penalty payments or fines up to 6% of X’s global annual turnover—estimated at €2.5-2.7 billion for 2024—potentially amounting to over €150 million in a single escalation. A Commission spokesperson clarified the penalty’s proportionality: “The amount is calculated based on the nature of the violations, the number of EU users affected, and the length of non-compliance—two years in this case.” This “modest but proportionate” approach, as Virkkunen termed it, signals the EU’s intent to build a graduated enforcement regime rather than immediate maximum penalties, though it leaves room for sterner measures against repeat offenders.
The ruling arrives against a backdrop of intensifying EU-US frictions over digital regulation. U.S. Vice President JD Vance decried it as “yet another attack on American innovation,” while FCC Chair Brendan Carr labeled the DSA “incompatible with America’s free speech tradition.” President Donald Trump has echoed these sentiments, threatening retaliatory tariffs on European imports. The Commission rebuffed such criticisms, with spokesperson Ariane Rossi asserting, “We have always been clear: We have the sovereign right to legislate and enforce our legislation, which we are doing. The DSA applies equally to all online platforms offering services in the EU—regardless of origin.” Virkkunen added in her statement: “This is not about targeting U.S. companies; it’s about protecting 450 million EU citizens from digital harms. Enforcement is blind to nationality.”
In a contrasting development, TikTok avoided a similar fine on the same day by committing to DSA-compliant reforms for its ad repository, including faster access and enhanced searchability. This settlement highlights the EU’s preference for voluntary compliance where possible, though ongoing investigations into Meta, Temu, and others signal broader scrutiny of Big Tech. For X, the decision compounds existing pressures: separate DSA probes into illegal content dissemination and information manipulation persist, and the platform faces antitrust challenges under the Digital Markets Act. As of Sunday, December 7, X has not publicly responded, but industry observers anticipate appeals to the European Court of Justice, potentially prolonging the saga into 2026.
This enforcement milestone reinforces the DSA’s teeth, enacted in 2022 to curb online harms post-Cambridge Analytica and January 6. With fines now in play, the EU aims to deter deceptive practices across the digital ecosystem, fostering a “safer, more accountable” online space, as Virkkunen concluded. Yet, as transatlantic rhetoric heats up, the ruling risks escalating a tech trade war, testing the balance between sovereignty and global innovation.
❤️ Support Independent Journalism
Your contribution keeps our reporting free, fearless, and accessible to everyone.
Or make a one-time donation
Secure via Razorpay • 12 monthly payments • Cancel anytime before next cycle
(We don't allow anyone to copy content. For Copyright or Use of Content related questions, visit here.)
Global Affairs Desk at The Chenab Times covers international developments, global diplomacy, and foreign policy issues through fact-based reporting, explainers, and analytical pieces. The desk focuses on major geopolitical events, diplomatic engagements, and international trends, with an emphasis on verified information, multiple perspectives, and contextual understanding of global affairs.
