The Supreme Court Collegium has put forward a recommendation for the appointment of three judicial officers as judges to the Himachal Pradesh High Court. This move aims to bolster the court’s bench, which is currently operating with a deficit, functioning with 12 judges against a sanctioned strength of 17, inclusive of the Chief Justice.
Information was available with The Chenab Times that the three judicial officers nominated for elevation are Chirag Bhanu Singh, Bhupesh Sharma, and Yogesh Jaswal. Upon approval and subsequent notification by the Department of Justice within the Central Government, these appointments are expected to bring the total number of judges at the Himachal Pradesh High Court to 15.
The Supreme Court Collegium, under the leadership of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, convened on June 2 to deliberate and finalize these recommendations. The apex court officially announced these decisions on Wednesday.
In addition to the Himachal Pradesh High Court appointments, the collegium also considered recommendations for the Punjab and Haryana High Court. It has proposed the elevation of two additional judges, Justice Harmeet Singh Grewal and Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa, to the status of permanent judges of that High Court. Justice Grewal and Justice Nalwa had initially taken their oaths as additional judges to the Punjab and Haryana High Court on February 17, 2025.
The Supreme Court Collegium, which also comprises Justice Vikram Nath and Justice JK Maheshwari, further recommended the appointment of advocate Amit Lahoti as a judge to the Madhya Pradesh High Court. This recommendation addresses a vacancy within the judiciary of Madhya Pradesh.
During the same June 2 meeting, the collegium also extended its recommendations to the Karnataka High Court, proposing the appointment of six lawyers as judges. These advocates are Raghavendra Seetharam Srivatsa, Hema Kulkarni, Subramanya Rangarao, Thadagavadi Prakash Vivekananda, Bakkeswara Pramod, and Hombe Gowda Shanthi Bhushan.
The process of judicial appointments in India involves a multi-stage mechanism, initiated by the High Court Collegium or the Chief Justice of the High Court. Recommendations are then forwarded to the Union Ministry of Law and Justice, which conducts checks and consults with relevant authorities before presenting the list to the Supreme Court Collegium for final approval. The Supreme Court Collegium then scrutinizes the proposed names, considering factors such as seniority, legal acumen, and integrity, before making its final recommendation to the President of India for the appointment of judges.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court, established on January 25, 1971, has a sanctioned strength that fluctuates based on judicial needs and government reviews. The current deficiency in judges highlights the ongoing challenges faced by various High Courts across India in maintaining optimal staffing levels, which can impact the speed of judicial proceedings and case disposal rates. Frequent vacancies can lead to increased workloads for existing judges and potentially prolong the time it takes for justice to be delivered.
The recommendations made by the Supreme Court Collegium are a crucial step in the appointment process. Once the collegium’s recommendation is received by the government, it is processed by the Department of Justice. Any adverse remarks or objections raised by constitutional authorities or intelligence agencies can lead to the names being returned to the collegium for reconsideration. However, if the collegium reiterates its recommendation, the government is generally bound to proceed with the appointment.
The elevation of judicial officers and advocates to the High Court benches is a testament to their legal expertise and service to the justice system. The process is designed to ensure that only the most qualified individuals are appointed to uphold the rule of law and administer justice effectively across the country. The inclusion of new judges in the Himachal Pradesh High Court is anticipated to help alleviate the existing workload and improve the efficiency of its judicial functions.
The Supreme Court Collegium’s role is pivotal in maintaining the independence and integrity of the Indian judiciary. Its recommendations are subject to rigorous scrutiny, ensuring that appointments are based on merit and suitability. The timely filling of judicial vacancies remains a critical objective for the Indian judicial system to effectively manage its caseload and uphold public trust in the administration of justice.
❤️ Support Independent Journalism
Your contribution keeps our reporting free, fearless, and accessible to everyone.
Or make a one-time donation
Secure via Razorpay • 12 monthly payments • Cancel anytime before next cycle
(We don't allow anyone to copy content. For Copyright or Use of Content related questions, visit here.)
The Chenab Times News Desk
