The Supreme Court of India has expressed significant concern regarding the practice of involving family members, particularly in-laws, in criminal cases stemming from marital disputes, and the use of children to disparage one another. In a recent order, a bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice K Vinod Chandran quashed a case registered under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act against the paternal aunt of a minor, whose parents are embroiled in a contentious divorce.
Information was available with The Chenab Times that the Supreme Court bench found fault with the Bombay High Court’s refusal to quash the case without a thorough examination of the evidence. The bench noted that it is a common occurrence for in-laws to be dragged into marital disputes to settle scores, and children are frequently used to undermine each other. However, the court voiced shock at allegations made by the divorced mother, claiming her son was being sexually molested by his paternal aunt.
The apex court observed that the First Information Report (FIR) appeared to be a retaliatory measure, filed shortly after the divorced father had lodged an FIR with equally serious allegations against the mother’s brother. The court’s attention was drawn to a divorce decree issued in September 2023, which was granted based on mutual consent. The appellant in this case is the paternal aunt of twin children born to the brother, who is now divorced from their mother.
According to the case details, the children were under the custody of the father, with the mother having visitation rights. The mother had alleged that her son raised the complaint of sexual harassment even while she was residing in the matrimonial home. She also stated that she had personally witnessed an incident of alleged molestation.
Crucially, the Supreme Court noted that no such allegations were raised at the time of the divorce proceedings. Furthermore, no complaint was filed prior to the registration of the FIR on March 17, 2024. This FIR was lodged mere hours after the father had filed a similar complaint against the maternal uncle. A plain reading of the FIR, the bench stated, did not inspire confidence.
The court emphasized that such practices of involving extended family members, particularly elders who may not be directly involved in the marital discord, can exacerbate the suffering of all parties, especially the children. The judiciary’s role, the bench implied, is to ensure justice and protect individuals from being unfairly targeted in disputes that primarily concern the couple involved.
The decision underscores the judiciary’s increasing scrutiny of cases where extraneous individuals are implicated in matrimonial disputes, often as a tactic to exert pressure or gain leverage. The Supreme Court’s intervention aims to prevent the misuse of legal processes and protect innocent individuals from the emotional and legal toll of being drawn into acrimonious family feuds.
Legal experts have pointed out that while the law provides mechanisms for addressing marital discord and ensuring child welfare, the Supreme Court’s stance highlights the need for careful consideration and evidence-based proceedings to avoid weaponizing criminal laws in civil disputes. The judgment serves as a cautionary reminder to litigants and lower courts alike about the importance of focusing on the core issues of a dispute and avoiding collateral damage to individuals not directly involved.
The ruling is expected to have implications for how similar cases are handled across the country, encouraging a more judicious approach in differentiating between genuine accusations and retaliatory filings in marital disputes. The court’s concern extends to the well-being of children, who can be adversely affected by the prolonged and often vindictive nature of such legal battles. By quashing the POCSO case, the Supreme Court has sent a clear message against the unwarranted dragging of in-laws into the complexities of divorce proceedings.
❤️ Support Independent Journalism
Your contribution keeps our reporting free, fearless, and accessible to everyone.
Or make a one-time donation
Secure via Razorpay • 12 monthly payments • Cancel anytime before next cycle
(We don't allow anyone to copy content. For Copyright or Use of Content related questions, visit here.)
The Chenab Times News Desk
