Iran Denies Current Negotiations with U.S., Cites Conditions for Future Talks

Iran’s Foreign Ministry stated on Monday that it is not presently engaged in negotiations with the United States, emphasizing that any future talks would be contingent on Washington altering its conduct. The ministry spokesperson, Esmaeil Baqaei, dismissed reports suggesting Tehran had initiated or sought negotiations with the U.S.

According to details received by The Chenab Times, Baqaei stated at a press briefing that claims of Iran requesting negotiations were fabrications circulated by the opposing side. He reiterated Iran’s consistent view of diplomacy as a crucial tool for safeguarding its national interests, asserting that the country has never hesitated to employ diplomatic means for this purpose.

While acknowledging that mediators might convey messages between the two nations, Baqaei clarified, “At the present time, we are not conducting any negotiations with the American side.” He articulated Iran’s conditions for potential future negotiations, stating that the U.S. must first exhibit more responsible behavior and learn to act as a responsible government, accusing Washington of recent conduct resembling that of a “mafia gang” that disregards international law.

The recent diplomatic stance follows a period of heightened tensions and exchanges of fire between the U.S. and Iran. Reports indicate that the U.S. military had halted strikes on Iran for two consecutive days, a pause that UN Ambassador Mike Waltz described as an effort to “give diplomacy some space.” However, Waltz also noted that U.S. military assets were continuing to move into the region, signaling a readiness to resume operations.

Mediators, reportedly including Pakistan and Qatar, are actively involved in efforts to bridge the gap between Washington and Tehran. These efforts aim to restore an interim ceasefire deal that had been significantly undermined by recent hostilities. Sources indicate that discussions between Iranian officials and their Omani counterparts have been constructive, focusing on mechanisms for managing maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran has insisted on maintaining control over the management of the Strait of Hormuz, including the collection of service fees, with Oman involved as a coastal state. This strategic waterway has been a focal point of recent confrontations, with Iran asserting its authority over vessel passage and criticizing U.S. actions in the region.

The U.S. Department of Defense has reportedly established a new category for reporting casualties to differentiate losses during the conflict with Iran by specific periods. Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that joint military operations with the U.S. had significantly impacted Iran’s nuclear program.

The broader context of the U.S.-Iran conflict has involved significant military operations, with the U.S. conducting strikes on Iranian coastal areas and infrastructure for nearly two weeks prior to the recent pause. Iran, in response, had targeted what it described as U.S. military facilities and equipment in regional countries.

The situation remains fluid, with diplomatic channels seemingly open through mediation, despite Iran’s official denial of direct ongoing negotiations with the United States. The emphasis on conditions for future talks highlights Iran’s stance on U.S. foreign policy and its regional actions.

Follow us on

Global Affairs Desk

Global Affairs Desk at The Chenab Times covers international developments, global diplomacy, and foreign policy issues through fact-based reporting, explainers, and analytical pieces. The desk focuses on major geopolitical events, diplomatic engagements, and international trends, with an emphasis on verified information, multiple perspectives, and contextual understanding of global affairs.